Why have you been so passive and uncaring about the obvious Trojan Horse of systemd? No concern about the increasing domination by one company (Red Hat)? Seriously?
Isn't SystemD a component of the kernel and so it's something that we should expect him to have an opinion on?
Oh, guess not. Plus, your question is the Trojan Horse, with a masked payload. Maybe he loves it. Maybe he doesn't spend time with the kinds of configurations needed to maintain a rack of servers because the distros take care of it.
Linus has switched desktop environments (more than once) and distros, and seems content to run anything that 1) has Linux at the core, and 2) Works and 3) There is no
No. Systemd has no kernel code, it uses standard Linux interfaces, open to all. Even if kdbus goes in it will not be reserved to systemd.
Overall, systemd is an extra-kernel computer system management system.
True even without the "overall"
Poettering+team once tried to submit some changes to Linux that broke Linux and Torvalds chewed them out for this [networkworld.com].
No. systemd read the/proc/cmdline file, a linux interface available to all user-level programs. It also wrote to the system log, a linux interface available to all user level programs running as root. Systemd included no code in the kernel
He would've accepted such changes had the team submitted their work in a way that wasn't broken as it was.
As the systemd team didn't ask for any code to be included in the kernel (then) there was no questio
Goddammit you ignorant retard, didn't you read my entire post before replying? Of course not, because this is DashSlot where retards convene.
Because the very next sentence was "Oh, guess not." It was sarcasm. I'm sure you can find a translation of what that word means in your native language, but it means you didn't understand me at all, and if you had read further, you might have understood, unless you were a FUCKING RETARDED PIECE OF SHIT,
Or maybe you just overlooked something, which I have done, and w
Systemd (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't SystemD a component of the kernel and so it's something that we should expect him to have an opinion on?
Oh, guess not. Plus, your question is the Trojan Horse, with a masked payload. Maybe he loves it. Maybe he doesn't spend time with the kinds of configurations needed to maintain a rack of servers because the distros take care of it.
Linus has switched desktop environments (more than once) and distros, and seems content to run anything that 1) has Linux at the core, and 2) Works and 3) There is no
Re: (Score:1)
Small parts of systemd have Linux components.
No. Systemd has no kernel code, it uses standard Linux interfaces, open to all. Even if kdbus goes in it will not be reserved to systemd.
Overall, systemd is an extra-kernel computer system management system.
True even without the "overall"
Poettering+team once tried to submit some changes to Linux that broke Linux and Torvalds chewed them out for this [networkworld.com].
No. systemd read the /proc/cmdline file, a linux interface available to all user-level programs. It also wrote to the system log, a linux interface available to all user level programs running as root. Systemd included no code in the kernel
He would've accepted such changes had the team submitted their work in a way that wasn't broken as it was.
As the systemd team didn't ask for any code to be included in the kernel (then) there was no questio
Re: (Score:1)
Isn't SystemD a component of the kernel
No.
Next question?
Re: (Score:2)
Goddammit you ignorant retard, didn't you read my entire post before replying? Of course not, because this is DashSlot where retards convene.
Because the very next sentence was "Oh, guess not." It was sarcasm. I'm sure you can find a translation of what that word means in your native language, but it means you didn't understand me at all, and if you had read further, you might have understood, unless you were a FUCKING RETARDED PIECE OF SHIT,
Or maybe you just overlooked something, which I have done, and w
Re: (Score:1)
Twat.