I find it amusing that you question somebody else's publicly known conviction anonymously. Shall we infer that perhaps you lack faith in your own convictions?
I find it amusing that you care whether or not someone fills in a data field with something completely arbitrary and unverifiable. Shall we infer that perhaps you wish ideas to be judged based on the people who propose them?
Why don't you man up, and give your full name, address and phone number?
Also, since when is personal faith in convictions some sort of yardstick of validity? Lee Deforest who supposedly "invented" the triode thought a hard vacuum was bad for tubes. That was his faith too.
You see but you do not observe.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, in "The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes"
Ask him about Darwin (Score:1, Insightful)
Mims is well known as a creationist. Ask him why he trusts science when it comes to electronics, but not when it comes to biology.
Re: (Score:-1)
Mims is well known as a creationist. Ask him why he trusts science when it comes to electronics, but not when it comes to biology.
(bump to get around crackhead downmod)
Re:Ask him about Darwin (Score:2)
Re: (Score:-1)
I find it amusing that you care whether or not someone fills in a data field with something completely arbitrary and unverifiable. Shall we infer that perhaps you wish ideas to be judged based on the people who propose them?
Re: (Score:0)
I post anonymously because the mods here are perpetually on crack, as the above downmodding of an honest (if a bit snarky) question demonstrates.
Re: (Score:0)
Also, since when is personal faith in convictions some sort of yardstick of validity? Lee Deforest who supposedly "invented" the triode thought a hard vacuum was bad for tubes. That was his faith too.