by Anonymous Coward writes:
on Friday November 19, 1999 @08:46AM (#1519329)
No I'm not saying the judged missed some needle in the haystack, but he obviously either couldnt be bothered to focus on the trial or had already made up his mind before all the evidence was in. Considering his finding of "fact" couldn't have been any more one sided if it had been written by Sun and surpised even the DOJ in its opinion of Microsoft it appears that he was far from impartial.
Here are some links from people as qualified as some of the so called experts polled by Slashdot
At least one of these has already been hashed out on Slashdot and in typical fashion deemed FUD because it sided with Microsoft. I really don't expect the typical/. poster to accept anything from the Microsoft site, but that article shows another side to the story than what is generally posted here. I noticed you ignored my example of the judge contridicting himself in the FoF, if Jackson is so all knowing and infaliable how can this be?
Re:Thankyou Slashdot (Score:1)
Here are some links from people as qualified as some of the so called experts polled by Slashdot
At least one of these has already been hashed out on Slashdot and in typical fashion deemed FUD because it sided with Microsoft. I really don't expect the typical /. poster to accept anything from the Microsoft site, but that article shows another side to the story than what is generally posted here. I noticed you ignored my example of the judge contridicting himself in the FoF, if Jackson is so all knowing and infaliable how can this be?