Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Media

+ - Should journalists fear or embrace jargon?->

Submitted by ananyo
ananyo (2519492) writes "In an opinion piece for Nature, science writer Trevor Quirk argues that researchers use jargon to "capture the complexity and specificity of scientific concepts". Avoiding jargon might mean that a piece ends up easier to read, but explaining a jargon term using everyday language "does not present the whole truth," he says.
"I find it troubling that the same antipathy that some writers express towards jargon has taken root in the public’s general attitude towards erudite language. I submit that this is no coincidence. People seem to resent not just specialized language, but any language that requires a large degree of labour to understand, appreciate and use," he writes. "The world increases in complexity every day, and we should not let shrink our capacity to describe it.""

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Should journalists fear or embrace jargon?

Comments Filter:

Today's scientific question is: What in the world is electricity? And where does it go after it leaves the toaster? -- Dave Barry, "What is Electricity?"

Working...