Ask the Air Force Cyber Command General About War in Cyberspace 315
We ran an article about the new Air Force Cyber Command and its recruiting efforts on February 13, 2008. Now Major General William Lord, who is in charge of this effort, has agreed to answer Slashdot users' questions. If you're thinking about joining up -- or just curious -- this is a golden opportunity to learn how our military is changing its command structure and recruiting efforts to deal with "cyberspace as a warfighting domain." Usual Slashdot interview rules apply.
As A Military Commander... (Score:3, Insightful)
How do we prevent "mission creep" (Score:5, Insightful)
What are the limits on this jurisdiction? Who enforces these limits, and how is the public informed of that status? How are efforts to extend being safeguarded from creating mission creep that threatens all civil discourse in the United States and abroad form targeting, suppression, propaganda and extra-legal surbeillance?
USAF Mining Data Useage Patterns to Find Thoughtcr (Score:3, Insightful)
It is good war is so terrible... (Score:5, Insightful)
The direct damage from such warfare would be primarily economic or data security related (rather than a cost in human lives) how do you feel we can prevent it from becoming a monthly, yearly, or daily occurance?
Re:As A Military Commander... (Score:4, Insightful)
You probably got moddded down because your choice of language suggests a certain naivete.
The internet is nothing until someone uses it. Just like a roadside bomb, a watering can, a butterknife. Since it's pointless to talk about it unless you talk about how it's used, then what you're really talking about are the people that use it, and how they use it. To say that it's inherently non-violent is to say that the people who use it are. Which is demonstrably false. And before someone mentions the non-violence of ones and zeros, please remember that much of warfare (including heading it off before someone tries to start one) is communications, awareness, readiness, and the health of your government, industry and other large systems... all of which now depend on the network. War is about controlling, or denying other people the use of the things that allow them to have power or influence over others - and a mammoth, globe-spanning communications system is now forever going to be a central venue for things very much related to violence. It already is.
more political than military re: MFN/trade status (Score:1, Insightful)
My question is: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Physical Fitness (Score:3, Insightful)
You have fitness issues that need correcting. Period.
Re:Skynet? (Score:2, Insightful)
My question is... how many military professionals are actually doing any of this work? From what I've heard, all they do is babysit computer screens and private contractors making 4x their pay. If that's the case, sign me up! (as a contractor.)
Re:relaxing rules (Score:2, Insightful)
And if the GP wasn't, then I am- First my ground assumptions:
This is an entirely different battlefield with entirely different physical constraints and requirements.
The particular KSAs involved tend to be found in persons that had some degree of social isolation.
Hard-core 'cyber' geeks tend towards fat, scrawny, gay, lesbian, blind in one eye, flat footed, or some combination of the above.
Would you agree that the intentions behind the policies excluding such people from serving in the armed forces do not apply [as strongly to / to] the Cyber Command? Would you be willing to look at creative means to be more inclusive of the community that you wish to recruit from?
flexibility (Score:4, Insightful)
I served proudly as an active duty member of the United States Air Force for 4 years and then in the Reserves for another 4 years. Although the Air Force is generally regarded as the most "modern" of the U.S. military branches, I still found that the overall structure was too rigid to take me where I wanted to go, so I followed my inner geek and moved fully into the civilian sector.
You said, 'We have to change the way we think about warriors of the future.' At first, I guessed that you would hire these individuals into government contractor positions, but the Wired article implies otherwise. Many of the brightest security experts, by nature, are highly independent and have a noted distaste for many of the standards that being in the Air Force require, such as basic training, dress and appearance, and physical fitness. How far will the Cyber Command bend the traditional standards in order to persuade the best and brightest in the security field to sign up into a military career?