Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft

Ask Microsoft's Linux Lab Manager 545

Microsoft Linux Lab Manager Bill Hilf has been mentioned on Slashdot before, not to mention (as you might expect) on Microsoft Watch. His latest high profile coworker, Daniel Robbins, has also gotten a bit of Slashdot attention. Got any questions for Bill he hasn't already answered elsewhere? Post them below (one per post, please). We'll send him 10 - 12 of the highest-moderated ones and post his answers next Monday.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ask Microsoft's Linux Lab Manager

Comments Filter:
  • by TempusMagus ( 723668 ) * on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:27PM (#13222654) Homepage Journal
    I'm somewhat uncomfortable with these interviews since they completely fall in line with PR strategy to shape opinion with the "slashdot crowd". Who initiates these interviews anyway?
  • by Raul654 ( 453029 ) on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:29PM (#13222680) Homepage
    Dear Mr. Hilf - Surely by now you have to have been accused of helping Microsoft try to exterminate Linux. How do you respond to such accusations?
  • Open Standards (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Oriumpor ( 446718 ) on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:29PM (#13222686) Homepage Journal
    How does Microsoft internally deal with Open Standards and Open Document Formats?

    I suppose more generally: In your testing is it solely relegated to Linux in the Server role, or do you address End-User issues as well
  • Penguin Aid? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by deathcloset ( 626704 ) on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:30PM (#13222692) Journal
    No doubt one of the activities of microsoft's linux lab is testing the security of linux.

    My question is this: if you find a security vulnerability in linux, do you inform the linux community about it?
  • Plans (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Azureflare ( 645778 ) on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:31PM (#13222706)
    What plans does Microsoft have to make it easier for corporations to let Windows and Linux live together happily? Are there plans to increase integration and open standards between platforms?

    I just went through integrating a linux server on the Windows 2003 Active Directory network here, and though it took some commandline work and messing with pam.d and samba, it wasn't actually that hard to get it joined up to the domain. Now everyone who has a login and password can login locally, as well as via SSH/sftp and jabber.

    I'm glad that Microsoft is letting linux/unix machines integrate at least somewhat, but it would please me to no end to see Microsoft extending their existing Unix services for Windows servers. I know that unix services exist for Windows servers, but we just haven't needed to install them yet (no need for LDAP at this point).

    P.S. I hope they keep you around for a while!

  • Marching Orders... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Lodragandraoidh ( 639696 ) on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:31PM (#13222709) Journal
    What are your marching orders for the Linux lab? (are you looking at interoperability with Windows - or is there something else on the agenda?)
  • by nurhussein ( 864532 ) on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:32PM (#13222716) Homepage
    We've heard a lot about MS having a lower TCO etc., and who knows it may even be true in some cases, but does Microsoft realise that the reason some of us is on Linux is for the "Free as in Freedom" part? This may matter not to the PHBs, but some of the Linux users MS is trying to court such as HPC consist of engineers and scientists who operate things like particle accelerators and are unfazed by the "complexity" of Linux and appreciate the freedom to be able to customise it to their needs? Can Microsoft ever be as liberal with their operating system as Linux developers are with Linux?
  • Re:first? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by jsheedy ( 772604 ) on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:35PM (#13222754) Homepage
    What prompted you to accept a position at Microsoft knowing their past dealings with the Open Source OS, or what told you that taking this position was not a waste of time?
  • by jellomizer ( 103300 ) * on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:37PM (#13222777)
    While Windows does have many advantages over Linux, I still find that Linux has many good nich areas where Microsoft can't and shouldn't compete in, such as rapid development of appliance like solutions, where the case of finding a low end box (In my case usually Sun Sparc Classics) and downloading a version of Linux and configuring it for headless task(s). This is extremely affordable to my clients in the short and long term. So the question is why isn't Microsoft working harder to make tools that allow Linux to better communicate with Windows? When there is an issue of poor communication between Linux and Windows I usually need to configure Windows to communicate with the Linux box better, which may or may not work 100% and because it is running on Windows it makes Windows look bad. Even if Microsoft released some closed source or Shared source code that would allow better communication between the two platforms would make my job and my clients lives much easer and affordable.
  • by Thud457 ( 234763 ) on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:38PM (#13222789) Homepage Journal
    When will MS Word finally get with the times and have a fully-featured standards-compliant Lisp interperter?!!!
  • Execs trying Linux? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by unsinged int ( 561600 ) on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:47PM (#13222882)
    Have you ever managed to get any of the big shots (for example, Gates) to sit down and try Linux for a few minutes? If so, what did they say? If not, why not? Did they have an allergic reaction and try to run away from you, or have you not asked?

    I think it would be interesting to hear the opinions of people at Microsoft who actually have tried Linux (with KDE, OpenOffice, Firefox, etc.), versus the standard "Linux is evil" public relations line.
  • by dtfinch ( 661405 ) * on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @12:49PM (#13222902) Journal
    Microsoft has long offered Services for Unix free for download to provide a unix-like environment on Windows. I've seen rumors and speculation that SFU will be included by default in Windows Vista, with some GPL'd portions replaced or rewritten to maintain compliance. If it's true, what level of functionality and compatibility can we expect?
  • by ajrs ( 186276 ) on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @01:18PM (#13223201) Homepage
    I've been using a Linux desktop for several years now. I develop software for Unix and Linux based systems. All of the tools I use are either open source, or have documented APIs.

    Why would I ever consider, let alone recomend, a Microsoft product?
  • .NET (Score:2, Interesting)

    by slashdotnickname ( 882178 ) on Tuesday August 02, 2005 @01:18PM (#13223208)
    What is Microsoft's general position on the open-source projects that are porting .NET to Linux (and other platforms)? Are there any plans to restrict parts of the .NET framework (e.g. WinForms) from being ported?

    Basically, I'm a fan of .NET and would like to hear something reassuring from Microsoft that they won't hinder in any way the development and use of .NET on other platforms. We all know what happened to DR.DOS...

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...