Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

What's It Like to be Google's Boss Techie?

Posted by Roblimo on Thu Jun 20, 2002 12:00 PM
from the how-many-miles-of-cable-do-you-think-they-buy-every-year? dept.
We'd like to welcome Google Director of Technology Craig Silverstein as our next Slashdot interview victim... err... guest. You think you run a big Linux server farm? Craig's is bigger. Think your Web site gets a lot of traffic and creates a lot of headaches? Just think what Craig must face! Post whatever you'd like to ask Craig below, one question per post. About 24 hours after this runs we'll email Craig 10 of the highest-moderated questions, and we'll post his answers shortly after he gets them back to us.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4
  • I've wondered (Score:5, Interesting)

    by lblack (124294) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:02PM (#3736976)
    Google always seem to be early-to-market with some really highly developed software solutions, and also always seems to have the backbone to support them.

    I'm curious -- what drives the innovation? Is it the hardware team advancing architecture to permit the software team more room to play, or is it the software team saying, "Hey, look what we got!" and the hardware team dropping the iron to implement it?

    I understand there must be some level of synergy, but is it completely seamless or is one side of the equation effectively driving the other?

    Leem
  • First Question! by Dannon (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:02PM
  • Simple question (Score:4, Interesting)

    by lwdupont (153781) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:03PM (#3736986)
    What type of machines/setup does Google use?

    (I've heard thousands of PC's with everything in RAM, but I'd love to hear it from the horses mouth)
  • Weird queries? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:04PM
  • Statistics (Score:3, Interesting)

    by suwain_2 (260792) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:05PM (#3737000) Journal
    A relatively simple, non-intellectual question, but I've always wondered -- just how many hits/how much bandwidth do you consume, and how many servers do you have to handle the load.
  • Favoring Big Guys (Score:5, Interesting)

    by PenguinRadio (69089) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:06PM (#3737002) Homepage
    Does google's policy of "ranking" the sites that have hits favor the "big guys" over more specific smaller traffic websites? That is, would a story on a site like CNN get a higher ranking in google on a keyword "Gulf War" than say a site (gulfwarveterans.com) that deals 100% with the Gulf War? Do you think you are leading to the commercialization of the web (i.e. the big power players) over smaller sites?
    • Re:Favoring Big Guys by jeaton (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:15PM
    • Googlebombing by HMV (Score:3) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:51PM
    • Re:Favoring Big Guys (Score:5, Insightful)

      by killmenow (184444) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:15PM (#3737677) Homepage
      Furthermore, estimates are that search engines miss a large portion of Internet content available. There must be literally millions of web pages that don't even show up in your cache because they are too small, or because nobody links to them. But there may be a site out there that has all the information you could ever want to know about some esoteric topic that only the person who created the site and the few friends that person may have...but since nobody else links to it, nobody else knows about it.

      So how do you find those treasure troves? And how do you decide which ones are treasure troves and which ones are the millions of "all about me" web pages? Or do you care?
      [ Parent ]
    • That's a completely bogus question! by mbauser2 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @04:43PM
    • Re:Favoring Big Guys by shilly (Score:1) Friday June 21 2002, @10:57AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Windependence Day (Score:3)

    by scubacuda (411898) <scubacuda&iname,com> on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:06PM (#3737005) Homepage
    What are YOU doing for Windependence Day [slashdot.org]?

  • by SquadBoy (167263) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:06PM (#3737006) Homepage Journal
    but I noticed a few months ago that Cisco now uses the Google engine to search the CCO. Congrats on that one. I've also noticed this new search box that Google is starting to produce. And it looks *very* cool. So my question is basically which is more important to your job the website or selling the service and the engine to people who need it?
  • Pigeon Computing (Score:4, Funny)

    by Black Aardvark House (541204) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:06PM (#3737008)
    Has there been any progress on the Pigeon Computing [google.com] initiative?
  • technetcast.ddj.com/ (Score:3, Informative)

    by rblackwe (240170) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:06PM (#3737010) Homepage
    A little old but interesting.

    The Technology Behind Google 2000-10-19 (1hr 13min) By Jim Reese, Chief Operations Engineer, Google. How to build an internet search engine that indexes 1-2 terabytes of data 200 million web pages- and serves it up at a rate of 1000 requests/second. (Hint: Start with a farm of 10,000+ Linux servers). The technology behind Google: company overview, search parameters and results, hardware and query load balancing, Linux cluster topology, scalability, fault tolerance, and more. [420]

    http://technetcast.ddj.com/tnc_search.html?key=g oo gle.
  • Why did you chose Linux? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by RinkSpringer (518787) <.rink. .at. .rink.nu.> on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:07PM (#3737011) Homepage Journal
    I am wondering why they chose Linux. Specifically, I wonder how they made the choice between all major OS-es (Linux, *BSD, Solaris and possibly Windows), as well as the software they use to power the site.
    • Re:Why did you chose Linux? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:40PM
    • Re:Why did you chose Linux? by pivo (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:48PM
    • And the Sergey says.... (Score:4, Informative)

      by qurob (543434) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:02PM (#3737562) Homepage

      From one interview...

      Jason: What led to Google's decision to use Linux? When did that start?

      Sergey: Well, Larry Page and I were in the Stanford PhD program in Computer Science. And we developed Google there. The way the computer science program worked is there was a hodgepodge of computer equipment lying around, and we would grab whatever scraps we could. We had all kinds of computers: HPs, Suns, Alphas and Intel's running Linux. So, we gained a lot of experience with all of those platforms.

      When we started Google, we had to make the decision of what we wanted to use. Of course we chose Linux, because it is the most cost effective solution.

      PCs are not only much cheaper these days, but we can also get them very quickly, because they're such a commodity item. That's an incredible benefit. We just installed another 1,000 computers and we got that done in a few weeks. That's really hard to do with any other kind of workstation. I think that's an advantage that people don't entirely realize.

      Jason: Did you view it as being better, or was cost the main reason?

      Sergey: It was better in some ways. Certainly for our purposes, we felt the support was better. For example, the actual kernel authors will respond to problems pretty quickly. They are especially responsive to Google nowadays, since we're so widely used. We can have a 15 minute turnaround. You can't really beat that for support.

      That was an important factor, but frankly, the cost was a bigger issue. PCs are so cheap, which is very important. Sun's Solaris is probably more stable than Linux on PCs. It's hard to determine the blame, whether it's the hardware or the operating system. But, it's a minor difference.

      Jason: Then, does all of your support come from newsgroups or do you actually pay for it through Red Hat?

      Sergey: We have an operations team of about ten people, which helps a lot. And other than that we check newsgroups and e-mail the authors of the code. Usually, if it's a problem we can't figure out, we go straight to the authors.

      Jason: Is Linux used on desktops at Google?

      Sergey: It depends. Engineering mostly runs Linux. Business development/marketing runs Windows. Actually, I use Linux with VMWare running Windows. Some people have two computers, particularly some people in engineering who do UI development and need to test things out on Windows platforms. I find it better to just use VmWare and have one computer.

      Jason: In a technical sense, what does Linux lack? What does it not provide?

      Sergey: The 64-bit file system, which I know they are working on. It's slowly coming around. I think there are still occasionally some stability issues. I'm not saying Linux is unique in that respect, but you definitely want to have reliability. There are some issues dealing with higher memory systems. If you get to 2GB, and you try to push it past that, we encounter various problems. I know we've had some trouble with the network stack when we really push it hard. In terms of having lost most connections from lots of different machines.


      And from another...

      How is Linux used at the Google Projects? Why was Linux choose to improve Google search engine?

      Sergey Brin: Actually, we currently run over 6,000 RedHat servers.

      Linux is used everywhere...on the 6,000+ servers themselves, as well as desktop machines for all of our technical employees. We chose Linux because if offers us the price for performance ratio. It's so nice to be able to customize any part of the operating system that we like, at anytime. We have a large degree of in-house Linux expertise, too.

      Most of our administrative tools were developed in-house, as well.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Why did you chose Linux? by skotte (Score:3) Friday June 21 2002, @03:09AM
  • Regression (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Have Blue (616) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:07PM (#3737014) Homepage
    The Internet is always described as a distributed system with no single point of failure. Google, however, has quickly become by far the most popular method of locating information. "Surfing" has been killed with modern search technology, it's so much easier to look through Google than the Web itself. If Google was down, I'm sure the Internet would be far less useful.

    Do you think Google has become an Internet point of failure? With the competition for larger and larger indexes, is the Internet becoming centralized? Do you think this is a bad thing?
    • Nice Question by sweatyboatman (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:36PM
    • Re:Regression by hagardtroll (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:54PM
    • Re:Regression by phatStrat (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @03:32PM
      • Re:Regression by skt (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @08:39PM
        • Re:Regression by ceejayoz (Score:2) Wednesday July 03 2002, @08:34PM
    • Re:Regression by Pinball Wizard (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @05:22PM
    • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Search engine spammers (Score:5, Interesting)

    by I Want GNU! (556631) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:07PM (#3737016) Homepage
    What are you doing to prevent the new generation of more sophisticated search engine spammers- spammers that use advanced software such as WebPosition Pro, spammers that feed fake pages to the Google crawler, spammers that make bogus link pages to their own sites? Doesn't this new level of sophistication on their part mean that in large part Google must emphasize human website reviewers, such as those provided by the Open Directory Project [dmoz.org], to a greater degree?
  • pictures or diagrams by z_gringo (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:07PM
  • Stumped (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Bios_Hakr (68586) <xptical@gma[ ]com ['il.' in gap]> on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:07PM (#3737018) Homepage
    As a new network configuration guy, I am often stumped by a problem. I usually turn to google first, and my supervisor second. What has been the biggest problem that you have dealt with that will stand out in your mind years from now? As the "Head Techie", where did you turn, and what was the eventual resolution?
    • Re:Stumped (Score:5, Funny)

      by ralmeida (106461) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:38PM (#3737323) Homepage
      I just pictured Google engineers turning to Google to fix some kind of problem that they might have... if we could kill the middleman, Google would achieve consciousness!
      [ Parent ]
  • I got one by bravehamster (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:07PM
    • Re:I got one by freq (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:18PM
  • Scientology (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ender81b (520454) <`moc.aksarbeni' `ta' `dllib'> on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:08PM (#3737027) Homepage Journal
    Does google plan on releasing more products like the Google Search Appliance [google.com] in the near future - specifically those that are geared more towards the consumer level rather than business market? I would, personally, love to have some sort of google search engine on my machine to rummage through all the stuff I have. Does google plan on expanding into this market or will you remain focused on the web?

    I know, I know, Only one question but - it begs to be asked - how well is your technology going to be able to scale? Considering the near-expotential growth of the internet will PageRank be able to keep up?
    • Re:Scientology by cybercuzco (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:10PM
      • Re:Scientology by ender81b (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:56PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Storage used (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Steffan (126616) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:08PM (#3737029)
    I understand that Google was using large numbers of IDE drives in lieu of more expensive but individually faster SCSI devices. What prompted the decision, and how have the concerns of reliability and performance been mitigated. What special technology, if any, was used to implement such a system
  • I'm curious... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by rgoer (521471) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:08PM (#3737030)
    ...as to what exactly Google does with the concepts it receives through the various Google-tech contests held. Have these ideas been made good use of? Do we see any of this in the Google we use every day? What about the ones that didn't win, do we see any of them?
  • Question 1 of 2: Language of choice? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by FortKnox (169099) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:08PM (#3737031) Homepage Journal
    Whats the google language of choice for web page building. I'd assume speed is the most important, so what language makes google so fast?
  • Creative Ideas (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Domasi (318366) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:08PM (#3737035) Homepage
    Is there anything new that Google is working on that is not currently displayed in your labs [google.com] section? If so could you explain it to us?


    • Re:Creative Ideas by beebware (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @05:58PM
    • Google Answers by Martin Spamer (Score:2) Friday June 21 2002, @08:46AM
      • Re:Google Answers by LegendLength (Score:1) Friday June 21 2002, @09:30AM
        • Alias by Martin Spamer (Score:2) Friday June 21 2002, @11:17AM
          • Re:Alias by LegendLength (Score:1) Saturday June 22 2002, @03:27AM
            • correct link by bcaulf (Score:1) Saturday June 22 2002, @01:11PM
  • Success by discstickers (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:08PM
    • Re:Success by hkmwbz (Score:1) Friday June 21 2002, @05:42AM
  • On call? by rice_burners_suck (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:08PM
    • Re:On call? by SquadBoy (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:33PM
      • Re:On call? by fruey (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:11PM
        • Re:On call? by msim (Score:1) Sunday June 30 2002, @09:23AM
          • Re:On call? by fruey (Score:1) Monday July 01 2002, @06:07AM
    • Re:On call? by rice_burners_suck (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @04:49PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • peer pressure (Score:5, Interesting)

    by seanw (45548) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:08PM (#3737039)
    as Google got more popular and eventually reached the status it holds today, did you feel any pressure (either internally or from outside the organization) to switch from a Linux based cluster to a proprietary solution (Windows comes to mind, but there are others). Where you (or others at Google) affected by any of the FUD that is put out, and did it affect your perception of Linux as a viable solution?
  • by dimer0 (461593) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:09PM (#3737047)
    What are your biggest turn-ons?

    Turn-offs?

    The worst date you ever had?

    • question by Transient0 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:41PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by AntipodesTroll (552543) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:09PM (#3737049) Homepage
    I wonder if Taco is gonna chime in with the question:

    "So, interested in buying a nerdy weblog site, only slightly soiled?"
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Dot com changes? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Telastyn (206146) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:10PM (#3737052)
    Last I heard Google was still the stereotypical "startup" type company; promoting morale over bureaucracy as long as the work got done. Hockey, pool, the Greatful Dead's ex-chef (iirc?), and tons of other perks.

    Did google keep the atmosphere as you've grown? did they keep it while others tanked?
  • Specs (Score:3, Interesting)

    by DeadBugs (546475) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:10PM (#3737054) Homepage
    I would be curious to the general overall specs to the hardware and software running google. In particular standard cpu? Linux version\distributor? clustering? database? Total memory? Total storage? etc.

    Go on, make us jealous
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • so... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by RogueProtoKol (577894) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:10PM (#3737056) Homepage
    ... what linux distrubution does the world's largest server farm use?
  • Academic ties (Score:4, Interesting)

    by dallen (11400) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:10PM (#3737057) Homepage Journal
    It seems that Google's great successs is partly due to research coming out of the academic world. How many google employees have advanced degrees, and can they publish non-proprietry research after they join Google? How do you see the interplay between high-tech and Academia?
  • DB Backend by axehind (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:10PM
    • Re:DB Backend by gregfortune (Score:2) Friday June 21 2002, @12:45AM
  • Question 2 of 2: Browser Stats (Score:3, Interesting)

    by FortKnox (169099) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:11PM (#3737063) Homepage Journal
    Since sites like slashdot don't like to give out their statistics, I'd like to ask, what percent of users use what web browser? Also, what percent of users use what OS?
  • Linguistics and Searching (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mshomphe (106567) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:11PM (#3737064) Homepage Journal
    Does Google use any natural language processing (when dealing with web pages, queries, etc.)? Are you planning on doing more with NLP in the future?
  • Dream system by binaryDigit (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:11PM
  • CO$ and Deep Linking (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Xaoswolf (524554) <Xaoswolf@@@gmail...com> on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:11PM (#3737070) Homepage Journal
    There have recently been several cases where people have sued because of the act of deep linking, or in the case of the Church of Scientology and Xenu.net, linking to information on other people's pages that someone claims a copyright to.

    How have these affected you and your job, and what are you feelings on this subject?

  • What kind of bandwidth/pipes/networking setup? by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:12PM
  • Logo work? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Xafloc (48004) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:12PM (#3737075) Homepage
    I have but one question... Who is the mastermind behind all the "special" logo changes that Google experiences throughout the year?

    My hats off to that team!

    • Re:Logo work? by littlerubberfeet (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:26PM
    • Re:Logo work? by SPautz (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:29PM
    • MOD PARENT DOWN by emoeric (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:32PM
    • Re:Logo work? (Score:4, Informative)

      by gblues (90260) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:33PM (#3737270)

      If you want to know more about the special logos (referred to as "Google doodles"), as well as see an archive of the Google doodles over the years, go here [google.com].

      Nathan

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Logo work? by dubiousmike (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:53PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Competitive by scubacuda (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:13PM
  • Google and IP address. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:13PM (#3737083)
    Why in this day and age does google continue to penalize sites that are virtual hosted? With ip addresses becoming harder to get/justify every day why does google discount the relevance of links that don't come from a unique ip address. Please don't just deny it, I think the Internet community deserves an explanation.
  • by PK_ERTW (538588) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:13PM (#3737089)
    Google recently ran it's "first annual programming contest," with a winner receiving $10,000. Many slashdotters suspect this was simply a way to recruit new talent. So, was finding new people one of the initial goals for this project, and have you hired any new programmers as a direct result of it? What were the other goals (PR, generation of new ideas, etc) where there?
  • Just exactly how cool is it. by TheDick (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:14PM
  • Logo artwork by Phantasm66 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:14PM
  • As a market leader... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Marx_Mrvelous (532372) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:14PM (#3737093) Homepage
    It's well known that you use Linux in your mega clusters. I was wondering if you have ever been approached by Microsoft, Sun, or HP in an effort to switch to their proprietary OSes.

    I can't imagine that you haven't. It must have been a huge decision to invest in one technology, so are you satisfied with what you have?
  • Does size really matter? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by scubacuda (411898) <scubacuda&iname,com> on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:15PM (#3737102) Homepage
    How do you feel about Alltheweb.com having a bigger index [slashdot.org]?

  • 'Web Indexing companies" (Score:5, Interesting)

    by RembrandtX (240864) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:15PM (#3737105) Homepage Journal
    Recently, the english division of our company [black and decker] hired 'HyperMedia Trafficing' or some other similar named company to get them 'more exposure' in the search engines.

    [forget the ethical debate about that .. or why no one bothered to ask me what to do.]

    What I want to know, is - going fowards - as more and more of these companies start up, and discover more and more unscrupulious ways of 'loading' the search engines with bogus hits/visits/data/etc. .. How does Google plan to make sure they are :

    1) Not loosing ad $$ to these folks
    and
    2) prefenting every search from returning something like www.hotgrannysex.com or www.top50.com as the 1st (or first 15) results for a search on .. well .. pretty much anything.

  • What happened to PigeonRank?! by Arallok (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:15PM
  • Forget Craig (Score:4, Funny)

    by Talisman (39902) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:16PM (#3737110) Homepage
    No offense to Mr. Silverstein, but I'm much more interested in Cindy [google.com]! Beautiful, highly successful nerds are terribly rare!

    Just so I'm not off-topic:

    Mr. Silverstein, how does Cindy look in tight sweaters?

    Drool...

    Talisman
  • Opinions on being open (Score:4, Interesting)

    by SuperguyA1 (90398) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:16PM (#3737112) Homepage
    One of the most impressive things about Google to me is how easily you seem to have embraced an open model. I realize the outward view of a company can be quite different from the internal view. How easy is it actually to make decisions such as opening API's. If it's easy can you give some advice on how one might convince their boss.

    Thanks,
    -Dave
  • The future of Google (Score:5, Interesting)

    by glh (14273) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:16PM (#3737115) Homepage Journal
    Hi Craig!

    I think Google absolutely rocks. It has by far the most intelligent/helpful search engine results. Thanks for the great service.

    Now onto the questions- what is the Google vision / strategy for the future? Where can Google go? From a search engine perspective, what are some of the challenges that you have and improvements that can be made (perhaps speeding up crawling to make the latest content available, for example)? How are you going about solving these challenges, and when can we expect them to be implemented?

    On a similar note, I've noticed that recently Google announced a "google box" that allows for corporate to take advantage of the google search algorithms and indexing. Any more products like this being planned?
  • Shoulda been asked by Fished (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:17PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Question for Google by saurabhchadha (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:17PM
  • Google suggestions by Ed Avis (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:17PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Attacks? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Fnagaton (580019) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:18PM (#3737132) Homepage Journal
    I have a number of web servers, some Unix some Windows, and the number of attempted attacks each day from different IPs must run in to about one hundred. It is mostly people trying to execute commands or using malformed URLs trying to exploit some known past security hole. My question is, how many attempted attacks each day do the Google servers get?
  • Can Google last? (Score:5, Interesting)

    Google is a great free public resource. My concern is that it has to be expensive running a resource like that. I know Google's strategy is somewhat to use the free resource as a loss leader to promote your search technology, but the key word in "loss leader" is "loss". It's a great theory as long as you are able find people who want and need your search technology.

    So my bottom line question is this: Does the web site pay for itself via the advertising? Is there a possibility that someday Google may decide the web site costs too much money to run if you get to a point where your reputation no longer needs the loss leader?

    • Re:Dumbass by Reality Master 101 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @06:12PM
      • Re:Dumbass by Reality Master 101 (Score:1) Friday June 21 2002, @11:01AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • so what does it look like? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by paradesign (561561) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:18PM (#3737134) Homepage
    I know the programming contest winner gets a tour of your facility, but I think I speak for all of us when I say, I wanna see it too!

    It would be great if you did a documentary feature with TechTv or someone, because its one thing to read about your facility, but it would be another to see it.

    Thanks for all of the help I've gotten from Google.com, I don't think I'd still be in schol without it.

    Paradesign

    PS, even just a photo feature on the site would be nice.

  • Google cache (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Greenrider (451799) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:18PM (#3737136)
    Anyone who has ever needed a piece of information that was on a broken page will agree that the Google page cache is perhaps one of the most underrated and useful parts of your search engine.

    There's one problem that everyone has with the cache, however - you don't deep-nest the caching, so that following any links on a cached page will lead to the original (probably broken) site, instead of to another cached page. Is there a technical or legal reason for why it works this way? Any chance we'll see deep caching at some point?
  • Google and 9/11 by openSoar (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:19PM
  • question for Craig by Jucius Maximus (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:19PM
  • Favourite search engine by fruey (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:19PM
  • My question by SlashdotTroll (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:21PM
  • Google's inescapable coolness. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rob_from_ca (118788) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:21PM (#3737169) Homepage
    How do you avoid business pressures to make short-sighted solutions, and consistently make good, common sense ideas work instead of adopting ones from marketing sources? Not only does Google have the best search engine technology, but you consistently do the "right" thing. Clean, quick homepage, text only well-identified ads, interesting research projects, etc...This is the way many search engines start, but they all went the way of the "dark" side instead of adopting the "right" solution. In my jobs, it's been very difficult to execute and justify good engineering (or just common sense) under pressure from the people who control the money. Any advice for driving through well-thought-out decisions instead of adopting the "management fad of the month"?
  • Possible to have too much power (Score:5, Interesting)

    by sphealey (2855) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:22PM (#3737171)
    In one of Robert Heinlein's novels (don't have the reference at hand), the main character is told to sit down in front of what we would think of today as (WWW + Google) and "learn whatever she can about everything". After a few weeks of coming up with some useful stuff, she finally asks the system: 'who controls this database?', and it replies 'not programmed with that information'. The next morning an assasination team tries to kill her.

    Not to be too "X-File'ish", but does there come a point where too much knowledge is captured in Google? A point where anything that doesn't exist in Google doesn't exist, period? Wouldn't that represent a very tempting target for a bin Laden or a John Ashcroft, to try to control how the modern world thinks?

    Kind of far out there, I know, but do you guys worry about this kind of thing?

    sPh

  • How do you manage your infrastructure? by mveloso (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:22PM
  • Slashdot effect? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Lumpish Scholar (17107) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:22PM (#3737174) Homepage Journal
    Many sites, when referenced by Slashdot, crumble under the load. Can you folks see any difference, either to your "main" servers (www.google.com) or your cache servers?
  • google API by bigmush (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:22PM
  • Your average day... by m0nkeyb0y (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:22PM
  • no questions by phrostie (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:24PM
  • mod_google (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TwP (149780) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:26PM (#3737213) Homepage
    Just curious when mod_google is going to be released for the apache webserver. It would be nice to have the power of Google indexing available to those of us without significant IT budgets (i.e. wife won't let me "buy another #$*@! computer").
    • Re:mod_google by DeadSea (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:05PM
    • Re:mod_google by llamalicious (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:08PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Load balancing? by Lumpish Scholar (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:26PM
  • What Distro & Why? by MrWinkey (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:26PM
  • When things get ugly (Score:5, Interesting)

    by timdorr (213400) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:28PM (#3737227) Homepage
    What's the worst thing ever to happen to the google server farm? (Besides the pidgeons knawing on cables)
  • Questions by Sadadar (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:28PM
  • Efficient technology. by CommonSalt (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:29PM
  • Dealing with DoS (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Wanker (17907) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:29PM (#3737237)
    How does google deal with denial of service attacks, particularly distributed ones?

    The rest of us just suck it up with fat network pipes, but a high-profile target like google would be the holy grail of Internet vandals.

    Has anyone ever poisoned your DNSes, effectively taking Google down even though the server are up? Successfully inserted bogus WAN routing info into the Internet, again effectively bringing down Google even though the servers are fine?

    What's your worst cracker/net vandal story?
  • here's a good one. =) by someonehasmyname (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:30PM
  • Database indexing and searching. by Principito (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:30PM
  • Key Ingredients To Success? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by timeOday (582209) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:30PM (#3737251)
    Conventional wisdom holds that marketing and strategy are the keys to success in business, and that technical excellence is a relatively minor factor. Yet google seems to have come out of nowhere to dominate an already crowded market for search engines - without Superbowl ads, a mascot, or (unless I'm mistaken) an IPO.

    To what do you credit the popularity of google? Do you consider google a "success," or are you holding out for thousands of employees and billions in cash flow?

  • What about the semantic web? by oisteink (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:31PM
  • Important question! by fractalk (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:31PM
  • What does Craig do for fun? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ManxStef (469602) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:32PM (#3737260) Homepage

    Personally I'm usually pretty drained after a fun day staring at the screen and typing like a monkey, and sometimes completely avoid the PC when I get home, prefering to chill with a decent book (currently Cradle to Cradle [slashdot.org]), zone-out in front of the TV, or go cycling in the beautiful Isle of Man [isleofman.com] (watch "Waking Ned Devine" for an idea of the scenery - jealous?<grin/>).

    So I guess my completely-non-tech question is:

    What do you do in "loafing" time (ie. loaf - To pass time at leisure; idle.), when you've left the office, "lost" the pager/Blackberry/PDA/mobile etc., and got away from it all?

    Cheers,
  • Heuristics by rumborak2000 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:33PM
  • The Web's full potential (Score:5, Interesting)

    by __past__ (542467) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:33PM (#3737276)
    What do you think about the Semantic Web [w3.org] initiative driven by the W3C and others?

    Do you expect widespread usage of RDF [w3.org]/DAML [daml.org]/OWL [w3.org]/TopicMaps [topicmaps.org] for explicit meta-data annotation of web resources, or will it be used only in small circles of specialized content providers like academia, or maybe not at all?

    How will Google react? Do you plan to use meta-data provided by web resources if found, and how will you decide if it isn't just made up to get people on some bogus pr0n site (like with those <meta>-Tags today)? Will it someday render the brute-force approach of full-text-indexing obsolete?

  • Distributed Google by maroberts (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:33PM
  • What's the spark? by slasho81 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:34PM
  • Why not Google as a Non-Profit? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mr_don't (311416) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:34PM (#3737282) Homepage
    ...or, what if google gets hit by a bus?

    Google has become such an important part of the Internet for millions of average users. With this in mind, my friends and I often joke about what would happen if (knock on wood) Google were to go out of business. I suggest that ICANN should do something useful for a change, and fund Google as an official, non-profit project for searching the net.

    Although I have heard that Google turns a good profit, what exactly is preventing Google from becoming a not-for-profit organization? Couldn't Google take the extra income from licensing its search to create better search technologies and pay the employees, rather than make some shareholders rich? Wouldn't this perhaps make Google a more sustainable organization?


  • Googe AS Gateway to the Internet by Nomad7674 (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:34PM
  • searching vulnerabilities by krammit (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:34PM
  • Technical Advisory Council by Lumpish Scholar (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:34PM
  • Google cache and copyright (Score:5, Interesting)

    by dargaud (518470) <slashdot AT gdargaud DOT net> on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:37PM (#3737319) Homepage
    The google cache threads on the muddy water of copyright. Do you feel like you are going to run into trouble because of it ? Some conflicted opinions about it are:
    • It serves copyrighted pages without the author's consent
    • It serves pages without the original site's knowledge
    • It's very useful
    • If a page is on the web, it can be archived/cached...
  • Staying on Top... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Dr. Molf (586917) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:38PM (#3737321) Homepage
    Google is an incredibly popular and effective website. I'm curious about the amount of pressure you have to expand in order to "stay competitive" or "aptly serve consumer's needs". Is there any kind of a push to go the way of yahoo or amazon and try and include EVERYTHING on that simple page? As things evolve, do you really see Google staying the top engine in 3 to 5 years?
  • Load Balancing? by Openadvocate (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:38PM
  • The Secret of Your Success? by broody (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:38PM
  • Newsgroups (Score:5, Funny)

    by scott1853 (194884) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:38PM (#3737330)
    I've made some really stupid posts to the newgroups in the past and I used my real name. Can you delete them for me?
    • Re:Newsgroups by sharkey (Score:3) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:21PM
    • Re:Newsgroups by Wanker (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:59PM
      • Re:Newsgroups by scott1853 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @03:09PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Monitoring & Maintenance by westphalia999 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:40PM
  • Leveraging distributed computing by pjt48108 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:40PM
  • The Electric Company by poopsie (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:41PM
  • Caching, forward, reverse proxy by ezs (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:41PM
  • Internal Admin Utilities? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by duffbeer703 (177751) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:41PM (#3737350) Homepage
    How do you guys manage thousands of servers spread throughout multiple datacenters?

    How do you handle user accounts? Event notification?

    Do you guys use "enterprise" software like Tivoli or Openview, or did you roll your own solution?
    • Re:Internal Admin Utilities? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by James Youngman (3732) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:39PM (#3737875) Homepage
      A previous poster (duffbeer703) asked
      How do you guys manage thousands of servers spread throughout multiple datacenters?

      How do you handle user accounts? Event notification?

      Do you guys use "enterprise" software like Tivoli or Openview, or did you roll your own solution?

      ... to which I would add,

      How do you balance the need to keep systems up-to-date against your (doubtless demanding) availability requirements? Is there enough redundancy in there that you just flip a machine out while it is updated? Presumably, however the machine is upgraded, this is automatic - you must have too many machines to do it any other way!

      How to you test these updates (security patches, distribution updates, regular changes to your own software, configuration tweaks)? Do you have some kind of enormous test environment containing a copy of 50% of the main Google cache or something? For that matter, how do you do the testing itself? Do you type "Most clowns drink blue fruit juice on Mars" in the search box and just verify that you get 184 hits, and say "right, it works", or do you have a more sophisticated method of testing it (for example do you run your test system against a captive internal dataset)?

      [ Parent ]
  • If this question gets modded to +5 Funny... by teamhasnoi (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:41PM
  • Google interface languages by seosamh (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:42PM
  • Employment by SpamJunkie (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:43PM
  • Google Technologies by OmniVector (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:43PM
  • I've asked this before by scott1853 (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:43PM
  • What about Kartoo style searches? by JT_Palmer (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:43PM
  • by Saint Aardvark (159009) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:43PM (#3737367) Homepage Journal
    Dang, torn between modding up questions and submitting one of my own...

    What would it take to Slashdot Google? What do you do to avoid this? Have you been Slashdotted before, either from Slashdot itself or from some other link?

  • linux by thayner (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:45PM
  • Testing and Deployment (Score:5, Insightful)

    by mo (2873) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:46PM (#3737387)
    How can you possibly test bugfixes/changes that need to get deployed to thousands of machines? Furthermore, how in the heck do you deploy the changes once they're tested. I understand you probably can't describe the exact process, but perhaps you can enlighten us on some principals learned on the subject of CM on such a massive scale.
  • Google API (Score:4, Interesting)

    by __past__ (542467) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:46PM (#3737390)
    After the introduction of the Google API [google.com], some people, especially from the REST [ebuilt.com] camp, criticized [xml.com] the the use of SOAP [w3.org], claiming it just adds superflous bloat and is generally "unwebby". What do you think about this?
  • copyright infringement? by static68 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:46PM
  • I'll give it a try. by Myuu (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:47PM
  • HTTP preferred language header by cnoocy (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:47PM
  • Ive got a good one!!! by sheepab (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:47PM
  • Business Model by Launch (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:47PM
  • IPO? by an_mo (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:47PM
  • I have one question... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Helmholtz Coil (581131) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:48PM (#3737413) Homepage Journal

    that comes to mind when I think of a huge server farm like Google's: can you give a rough order of magnitude (# of zeros maybe) on what your electric bill is?

    Thanks very much for Google. The more I use it the more I appreciate it.

  • Does Larry Schwimmer still beep? by John Harrison (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:49PM
  • Keeping a small company feel in a big company by gentlewizard (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:50PM
  • Are you guys making enough money? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Control-Z (321144) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:50PM (#3737431)
    Are you guys making enough money?

    I wish you'd give us some banner ads or something, I feel guilty. I don't want Google to go away. :)

    Seriously, why don't you serve banner ads?

    -Dan
  • Google Voice Search (Score:5, Interesting)

    by NeoYoda (584952) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:50PM (#3737434)
    There has been much debate about what the practical purpose for Google Voice search [google.com] might be, could you fill us in? Is it really for use in cars?
  • why the ancient design technique? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Ravagin (100668) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:52PM (#3737449)
    Ahoy love the google, it's the only engine I trust these days. Nevertheless....

    For a site where speed and information delivery are of the utmost importance, and archaic table-based design seems rather strange. Is there any reason you have yet switched to a more forwards-compatible xhtml/css design? (Note that by "design" I mean more the html and css than the visual appearance of it)

    For my own amusement, I've been looking at recoding the google design in CSS, and it's really not that hard.

    Thanks!
  • Not infinitely recursive? by dmarien (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:52PM
  • Associative Search by dah0ba (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:53PM
  • how sec is google? by joost.be (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:54PM
  • Corporate culture question... by jzarzosa (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:54PM
  • Is Kartoo style competition? by JT_Palmer (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:55PM
  • by apol (94049) on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:55PM (#3737491)
    I've become addicted to the Google toolbar [google.com]. It only works with IE which I use at work since I am forced to use windows there. Now with Mozilla 1.0 and my constant wish to minimise the usage of Microsoft products, I am faced with the dilemma of keeping IE or loosing the Google toolbar.

    Why haven't you implemented yet the toolbar for open source browsers? Are there technical difficulties or rather lack of interest from Google?

  • Failure by porkface (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:56PM
  • File System by Launch (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:57PM
  • What about Power and air-con demands ?. by openmtl (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:57PM
  • Basic Stats by dbc001 (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:57PM
  • Three letter agencies (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 20 2002, @12:58PM (#3737521)
    Can you tell us anything about how you are working
    with the various intelligence agencies to provide
    them information about seraches that are of interest to them?
    Are you thinking of providing SSL access to your
    web pages so that these agencies will have to work
    with you instead just monitoring your network
    traffic?
  • Cost of running... by IanBevan (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:59PM
  • Are you a gamer? by Red Oktober (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @12:59PM
  • I'm curious. by enkidu55 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:00PM
  • How do you benchmark your software? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Nijika (525558) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:00PM (#3737537) Homepage Journal
    How does Google benchmark software? Eg how do you benchmark Apache, SQL, your CGIs etc...
  • Censorship by aiabx (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:02PM
  • Cache for content. by bhsx (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:02PM
  • What's the back end? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Second_Derivative (257815) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:03PM (#3737563)
    I don't remember what HTTPd they're running but it sure as hell isn't apache. Someone said that they get 1k hits per SECOND; what do you use to shape that insane amount of traffic? What is the '/search' page coded in? What databases are used to index a terabyte of data? How do those 10,000 nodes find the data they need to quickly? what sort of interlinks are used?

    How to you build a cluster like a war machine, in other words? ;)
  • Google Infrastructure & Ad Systems by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:07PM
  • Speech recognition (Score:5, Interesting)

    by harmonica (29841) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:09PM (#3737626)
    Are there plans to index audio files (and the audio tracks of video files) so that these could be searched as well? I would guess that existing speech recognition packages could be reused for this purpose so that development would not be too complicated.

    Recognizing text in images and videos and indexing that would be a similar task. I know that Google Catalog Search [google.com] must be doing some OCR already, but I have no idea if this would take too many CPU cycles if applied to all images, or if there are other problems (the images themselves already get downloaded for the image search, so bandwidth should not be the problem).
  • Google slashdotted by Senior Frac (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:10PM
  • Should people use more than one Search Engine by tinla (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:11PM
  • Google Search Appliance - PageRank? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by nanobug (446693) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:13PM (#3737666)
    Google's PageRank technology works very well on the web with lots of pages pointing to lots of other pages.

    The Google Search Appliance, however, is targeted at an office environment. Most of the documents (especially the non-html ones) in the typical office stand alone and do not have links to each other.

    How has Google modified or complimented (if at all) the PageRank algorithm to make it more suited to an office environment?

    I am currently pushing management at my site to purchase a Google Search Appliance, so I need an answer to this to help justify the change from our existing search application. i.e. without a good PageRank score, how does the Search Appliance order the result set in a useful way?
  • Accepting ads for net abuse by Frater 219 (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:13PM
  • Open Source by InodoroPereyra (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:13PM
  • Regexp Support Someday? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ReadParse (38517) <john@funnyc[ ]com ['ow.' in gap]> on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:17PM (#3737699) Homepage
    A big part of Google's strength is in the supported search syntax, most notably that you can search for phrases instead of just keywords, that you can filter OUT certain phrases or keywords, and that you can search for content on specific sites, or NOT on specific sites. The next step for me and probably a lot of other Unix/Perl types is regular expression support.

    For example, let's say I'm looking for 80's brat pack member Anthony Michael Hall (not that I would do such a think), but I can't remember his middle name. Looking for "Anthony Hall" will do me little if any good, but looking for "Anthony \w+ Hall" could do the trick nicely.

    Another example is that the user can provide their own limited fuzzy searching, by searching for optional prefixes and suffixes along with the root, instead of having to get the word or phrase exactly as it's indexed.

    Thanks,
    John
  • Searching for new pages by good-n-nappy (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:19PM
  • Next big thing? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by byee (221083) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:20PM (#3737719)
    A few years ago Google came along with their new ranking algorithim and blew away all other competition. Now it's the only search engine I, and the vast majority of the people I know, use.


    What is Google doing to keep itself on top? Do you think there is a lot of room for improvement? How do you think web searching can get better?

  • "The Slashdot Effect" (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Zzootnik (179922) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:22PM (#3737736)
    So I'm truly surprised no one has asked this one yet, as it's the first thing that popped into my head...

    The masses of Slashdotters have slashed and dotted many an unlucky website over the years...Pushing webservers to their limit and often breaking them outright...

    With Google's Massive resources, Is there any noticeable difference when a /. story gets posted and people go stampeding to google to find out more? Or is that happening right now? (I'd hate to think of myself as part of a huge herd of individually acting DDOS'ers, but unfortunately, that's about what it ends up being...)

  • Google toolbar for Netscape / Mozilla? by sphealey (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:22PM
  • Combating The Evil Scourage Of Network-Land by psypete (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:22PM
  • What about incorporating Cyc? by raylee5 (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:23PM
  • Recruitment with Google by dazdaz (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:26PM
  • Database by totallygeek (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:27PM
  • Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats by thelizman (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:29PM
  • Operating System by evilviper (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:29PM
  • Has Google been sued? by dazdaz (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:29PM
  • Pictures would be cool. by bakuretsu (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:29PM
  • Image / video searching by openSoar (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:31PM
  • Are you making any money yet? by whatthef*ck (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:34PM
  • Mozilla Google toolbar by dazdaz (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:35PM
  • DOJ or HLS talking to you? by randomErr (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:36PM
  • who pays for the bandwidth required? by cdn-programmer (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:36PM
  • editor by ppetru (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:36PM
  • searching by alexo (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:37PM
  • Public Utility by killmenow (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:38PM
  • Philosophy of leading google by hnchou (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:43PM
  • Data mining search queries by AAAWalrus (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:45PM
  • Logos by Tablespork (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:46PM
  • More popular cached pages by Richard5mith (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:48PM
  • Uptime by Tablespork (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:49PM
  • opening up the data for science (Score:3, Interesting)

    by fons (190526) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:49PM (#3737954) Homepage
    While doing some scientific research I discovered that the the Google Seitgeist is a very interesting source of information for research in the area's of social and communication sciences (marketing, lifestyle, ...).

    However, the available information and the explanation of used methodology is too limitid to make this information usefull scientifically.

    This is a shame because the Seitgeist is just the tip of the iceberg. There must be an enormous amount of information available.

    I know for sure that a few professors I know would have a field day if they were to be able to analyse all this data.

    My question is: would it be possible to open all the available data to scientists for statistical analysis?

    It doesn't even have to be free I think. Universities and research organisations pay a lot of money for survey's that result in datasets that are relativly small to the dataset available at Google.

  • Use of Python (Score:5, Interesting)

    by BobRoss (63028) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:49PM (#3737955)
    I have heard that Google uses Python extensively to manage its data, grab new data, etc.

    As an avid fan of the Python language, I am interested in exactly how Google puts it to use. Can you clue us in?

    P.S. - Keep up the good work!
  • The interview by inkfox (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:50PM
  • downtime disaster stories (Score:4, Interesting)

    by fons (190526) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:54PM (#3737981) Homepage

    We've all had servers crashing on us just before a deadline. We've all had to go to the office in the middle of the night to prevent a disaster. (we've all been hacked by a scipt-kid, once)

    Do you have any stories of disasters or difficult moments in the datacenters that kept you all up for a few nights in a row, but went by unnoticed by the public?
  • uh, got toolbar by benthayer1 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:54PM
  • Investing in Google? by nautical9 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:54PM
  • My question... (Score:4, Funny)

    by Kickstart70 (531316) on Thursday June 20 2002, @01:55PM (#3737992) Homepage
    What's the root password?

    :)

    Kickstart
  • The New Competition: Teoma and Wizenut by cjohnson (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:57PM
  • power, censorship and transparency by mml (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:59PM
  • Does he ever feel lucky? by Newer Guy (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @01:59PM
  • See who you are interviewing! by jbarr (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:01PM
  • Python at google by Corvus (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:02PM
  • Ogle the Google by Anne_Nonymous (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:03PM
  • Google Toolbar for non-IE/Windows boxen? by mshomphe (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:05PM
  • Constant Availability by wide_awake (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:15PM
  • Do you..... by pjdepasq (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:16PM
  • See who you are interviewing! by jbarr (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:18PM
  • Google Security by calib0r (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:18PM
  • I wanted to know... by quasi_steller (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:20PM
  • googlewhacking by Prowl (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:22PM
  • Will Google continue profitability in the future? by mike3411 (Score:1) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:24PM
  • Google Office Systems by scriptopia (Score:2) Thursday June 20 2002, @02:25PM
  • King of the search engines (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mikosullivan (320993) <miko&idocs,com> on Thursday June 20 2002, @02:25PM (#3738242)
    • CUI was king of the search engines. WebCrawler took them down.
    • WebCrawler was king of the search engines. AltaVista took them down.
    • AltaVista was king of the search engines. Google took them down.
    • Google is king of the search engines.

    Does this chain of thought keep you up at night?

  • 42 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4